<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>mattAdkins[dot]com &#187; cinema</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.matt-adkins.com/tag/cinema/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.matt-adkins.com</link>
	<description>Seeding The Cloud By Thinking Out Loud</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 05:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Film Inspiration</title>
		<link>http://www.matt-adkins.com/reviews/film-inspiration/</link>
		<comments>http://www.matt-adkins.com/reviews/film-inspiration/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Dec 2009 17:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cinema]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inspiration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matt-adkins.com/?p=306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Film often runs in parallel with life and it feeds off it but I don&#8217;t think it necessarily nurtures it. I don&#8217;t think it necessarily contributes in the way we think it does. We, in our world, in our bubble (&#8230;)</p><p><a href="http://www.matt-adkins.com/reviews/film-inspiration/">Read the rest of this entry &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p><div id="attachment_318" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 451px"><img class="size-full wp-image-318 " title="La Jetee [1962, Chris Marker]" src="http://www.matt-adkins.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/LaJetee.jpg" alt="Still image from LA JETEE" width="441" height="276" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Still image from LA JETEE</p></div>Film often runs in parallel with life and it feeds off it but I don&#8217;t think it necessarily nurtures it. I don&#8217;t think it necessarily contributes in the way we think it does. We, in our world, in our bubble that we work in, imagine that it does but I am not sure that it does. &#8211; Danny Boyle</p></blockquote>
<p>Nice article in THE INDEPENDENT regarding films that inspired directors: <a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/films/features/the-movie-that-mattered-to-me-1828427.html">The movie that mattered to me &#8211; Features, Films &#8211; The Independent</a>.</p>
<p>From the book:  <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1844571912?ie=UTF8&amp;tag=roupre-20&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=1844571912">Screen Epiphanies: Filmmakers on the Films that Inspired Them</a><img style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=roupre-20&amp;l=as2&amp;o=1&amp;a=1844571912" border="0" alt="" width="1" height="1" /></p>
<p>Tip &#8216;the hat to <a title="kottke.org" href="http://kottke.org/09/12/films-that-inspired-directors" target="_blank">Kottke</a> for the link&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.matt-adkins.com/reviews/film-inspiration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sigh. Another List of Movies</title>
		<link>http://www.matt-adkins.com/commentary/sigh-another-list-of-movies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.matt-adkins.com/commentary/sigh-another-list-of-movies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 17:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bitching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cinema]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matt-adkins.com/?p=234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...whenever a fancy new video format (widescreen, dvd, blu-ray) appears I always make sure my first purchases are for films with real beauty...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_235" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 120px"><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00003CX8S?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=roupre-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=390957&#038;creativeASIN=B00003CX8S"><img src="http://www.matt-adkins.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/az-age-innocence.jpg" alt="Age Of Innocence" title="Age Of Innocence" width="110" height="160" class="size-full wp-image-235" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Age Of Innocence</p></div>
<p>Here&#8217;s &#8220;<a href="http://www.pajiba.com/seriously_random_lists/the-20-most-boring-films-of-all-time.php">The 20 Most Boring Films of All Time</a>&#8220;, according to <a href="http://www.pajiba.com/">Pajiba</a> commenters. </p>
<p>I genuinely like at least 7 of the 20 films. And whenever a fancy new video format (widescreen, dvd, blu-ray) appears I always make sure my first purchases are for films with real beauty. Usually #1 on my list (and sadly also on this one&#8230;): <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000Q66J1M?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=roupre-20&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=390957&#038;creativeASIN=B000Q66J1M">2001: A Space Odyssey</a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=roupre-20&#038;l=as2&#038;o=1&#038;a=B000Q66J1M" width="1" height="1" border="0" alt="" style="border:none !important; margin:0px !important;" /></p>
<p>Luckily, some reason appeared if you made it far enough down the comments to the response of &#8220;Yossarian&#8221;: </p>
<blockquote><p>
What is really notable about this list is it is sort of a backlash against more complex films that got some media attention and, as a result, were exposed to a lot of people who didn&#8217;t really appreciate them.</p>
<p>When you say a film was boring what you really mean is that it doesn&#8217;t engage your attention. Instead of taking this failure to appeal to you as a flaw in the movie you should know that it&#8217;s probably just you. Of course there are bad movies out there, but they don&#8217;t usually get Oscar nominations.</p></blockquote>
<p>I thank you, anonymous internet commenter&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.matt-adkins.com/commentary/sigh-another-list-of-movies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scorsese sez: How about you &#8216;pan and scan&#8217; my ass?</title>
		<link>http://www.matt-adkins.com/commentary/scorsese-sez-how-about-you-pan-and-scan-my-ass/</link>
		<comments>http://www.matt-adkins.com/commentary/scorsese-sez-how-about-you-pan-and-scan-my-ass/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 16:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cinema]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[snobbery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matt-adkins.com/?p=190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whenever I start feeling a bit snooty about preferring/demanding the widescreen version of a film, it helps to watch a bit of &#8220;pan &#038; scan&#8221; footage so I can get all uppity again. Today Jason Kottke posted a link to (&#8230;)</p><p><a href="http://www.matt-adkins.com/commentary/scorsese-sez-how-about-you-pan-and-scan-my-ass/">Read the rest of this entry &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whenever I start feeling a bit snooty about preferring/demanding the widescreen version of a film, it helps to watch a bit of &#8220;pan &#038; scan&#8221; footage so I can get all uppity again.</p>
<p>Today <a href="http://kottke.org/09/08/widescreen-vs-pan-and-scan">Jason Kottke posted a link</a> to the video below, in which some big name filmmakers school you on exactly what&#8217;s happening.  </p>
<p>[This also brings to mind <a href="http://www.dgaquarterly.org/BACKISSUES/Summer2009/InMyOpinion/tabid/720/Default.aspx">the Steven Soderbergh rant</a> from a while back about how some networks (HBO, Showtime, AMC, etc) chop down the films they show:</p>
<blockquote><p>"...it’s fucking lame to watch Jaws—a film that uses the 2.40 ratio as well as any ever produced—in the wrong format on HBO. Does Universal so badly need a few extra pennies that it’s willing to ruin a classic? And does HBO really think its viewers are so stupid as to forget movies currently come in two sizes?</p></blockquote>
<p> The original link to the article seems to be unavailable, but <a href="http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?s=d4d75942ff2d5da97e7172493b92ade8&#038;p=16965401#post16965401">a kind soul on the AVS Forums had reposted it here</a>.]</p>
<p>httpv://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GMJhM3So4y8</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.matt-adkins.com/commentary/scorsese-sez-how-about-you-pan-and-scan-my-ass/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Time travel in popular film and tv</title>
		<link>http://www.matt-adkins.com/of-note/time-travel-in-popular-film-and-tv/</link>
		<comments>http://www.matt-adkins.com/of-note/time-travel-in-popular-film-and-tv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 16:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[OF NOTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cinema]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matt-adkins.com/?p=176</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Beautiful chart from Information Is Beautiful Timelines: Time travel in popular film and tv &#124; Information Is Beautiful.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beautiful chart from <strong>Information Is Beautiful</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.informationisbeautiful.net/visualizations/timelines/">Timelines: Time travel in popular film and tv | Information Is Beautiful</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.matt-adkins.com/of-note/time-travel-in-popular-film-and-tv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>[OMG Posters] “The Dude” Art Print by Ben Swift  (Second Edition)</title>
		<link>http://www.matt-adkins.com/of-note/%e2%80%9cthe-dude%e2%80%9d-art-print-by-ben-swift-second-edition/</link>
		<comments>http://www.matt-adkins.com/of-note/%e2%80%9cthe-dude%e2%80%9d-art-print-by-ben-swift-second-edition/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[OF NOTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[awesome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cinema]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lebowski]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matt-adkins.com/archives/92</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“The Dude” Art Print by Ben Swift (Second Edition) After much debate, Ben Swift has indeed decided to release a second edition of his popular Lebowski-themed art print, “The Dude”.  It’s a 12? x 16? screenprint, has an edition of (&#8230;)</p><p><a href="http://www.matt-adkins.com/of-note/%e2%80%9cthe-dude%e2%80%9d-art-print-by-ben-swift-second-edition/">Read the rest of this entry &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“The Dude” Art Print by Ben Swift  (Second Edition)</p>
<p>After much debate, Ben Swift has indeed decided to release a second edition of his popular Lebowski-themed art print, “The Dude”.  It’s a 12? x 16? screenprint, has an edition of 180, and costs $20.  These will likely go pretty fast, so grab one now in the <a href="http://www.gigposters.com/classifieds/useritems.php?user_siteid=8409">Gigposters.com Classifieds</a>.</p>
<p><strong>EDIT:  Not sure why this disappeared for awhile, but it’s back.</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.gigposters.com/classifieds/useritems.php?user_siteid=8409"><img title="The Dude" src="http://i39.photobucket.com/albums/e158/mcnail/8294_0201E2fmgLXBj7XY.jpg" alt="" width="404" height="533" /></a></p>
<p><img src="http://feeds2.feedburner.com/~r/OhmygawdPosters/~4/GtrjFsNfS7M" height="1" width="1" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/reader/public/atom/user/08856740625603976167/state/com.google/broadcast">Go to Source</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.matt-adkins.com/of-note/%e2%80%9cthe-dude%e2%80%9d-art-print-by-ben-swift-second-edition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>[via METAFILTER]  If a movie only exists on film but no one is around to distribute it, does  it still exist?</title>
		<link>http://www.matt-adkins.com/commentary/if-a-movie-only-exists-on-film-but-no-one-is-around-to-distribute-it-does-it-still-exist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.matt-adkins.com/commentary/if-a-movie-only-exists-on-film-but-no-one-is-around-to-distribute-it-does-it-still-exist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Commentary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OF NOTE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cinema]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.matt-adkins.com/archives/97</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If a movie only exists on film but no one is around to distribute it, does it still exist? Shared by Matt I had some dealings with NEW YORKER when I booked films at the Tulane campus. Great stuff, and (&#8230;)</p><p><a href="http://www.matt-adkins.com/commentary/if-a-movie-only-exists-on-film-but-no-one-is-around-to-distribute-it-does-it-still-exist/">Read the rest of this entry &#187;</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If a movie only exists on film but no one is around to distribute it, does  it still exist?</p>
<blockquote><p>Shared by  Matt<br />
<br />
I had some dealings with NEW YORKER when I booked films at the Tulane campus. Great stuff, and nice people.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.newyorkerfilms.com">New Yorker Films</a>, the only US distributor of many of the films of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Luc_Godard">Jean-Luc Godard</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ousmane_Semb%C3%A8ne">Ousmane Sèmbene</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rainer_Werner_Fassbinder">Rainer Werner Fassbinder</a>, and many others <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/24/movies/24film.html?_r=1&amp;ref=movies">closed operations</a> yesterday. Many of the films they distributed remain <a href="https://securesite.chireader.com/cgi-bin/Archive/abridged2.bat?path=1994/940722/LETTERS/TALBOT">unavailable on DVD</a>, and thus completely unavailable to Americans for the foreseeable future. Coming on the heels of the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/11/movies/11coop.html?_r=3">eviction</a> of <a href="http://www.film-makerscoop.com/">Film-Maker&#8217;s Co-Op</a>, New York&#8217;s venerable distributor and archive of <a href="http://fredcamper.com/Film/Video.html">avant-garde film</a>, New Yorker&#8217;s closing raises questions not only about the symbiotic importance of <a href="http://filmonfilm.org/publications/futureofrep.html">repertory film exhibition</a> for <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Film_preservation">film preservation</a> efforts, but about the future of film culture and the <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/entertainment/reviews/critics/chi-talk-jones-stimulus-monfeb09,0,6624082.story">possible role of the arts</a> in the future economy. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/reader/public/atom/user/08856740625603976167/state/com.google/broadcast">Go to Source</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.matt-adkins.com/commentary/if-a-movie-only-exists-on-film-but-no-one-is-around-to-distribute-it-does-it-still-exist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

